?iTunes reject¿?

Joined: 04 Jun 2006 Posts: 4 Location: Tollhouse, CA

Several times I have created a feed keyed for iTunes, Feed for All saves it. When I try to upload to apple it is rejected with a 500 note.

¿¿??

Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Posts: 2393

sunmt wrote:

Several times I have created a feed keyed for iTunes, Feed for All saves it. When I try to upload to apple it is rejected with a 500 note.

¿¿??

Can you subscribe to the feed in iTunes using the URL you are submitting to the iTMS?

Jim

Joined: 04 Jun 2006 Posts: 4 Location: Tollhouse, CA

Jim ?—?—

Thanks for response. We don?’t understand it. Might you give us more details¿? Thanks.

Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Posts: 2393

sunmt wrote:

Jim ?—?—

Thanks for response. We don?’t understand it. Might you give us more details¿? Thanks.

In the iTunes software under the Advanced menu there is "Subscribe to podcast". If you subscribe to your podcast using that and the URL you submitted to the ITMS does it work?

Jim

Joined: 04 Jun 2006 Posts: 4 Location: Tollhouse, CA

Jim ?—?—

Thanks. It doesn?’t work. Get the title with a !

Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Posts: 2393

sunmt wrote:

Jim ?—?—

Thanks. It doesn?’t work. Get the title with a !

Once it works that way, then try submitting again. The specs detail this simple test, http://www.apple.com/itunes/podcasts/techspecs.html

Jim

Joined: 04 Jun 2006 Posts: 4 Location: Tollhouse, CA

Jime ?—?—

Thanks for staying with us. We tried again. No luck. We went to that Apple link and danced through all the points. Scanned is a better word than danced. Our reaction is that we bought FeedforAll to avoid dealing with the code. It took us a few dances to get through FeedforAll. When it finally OKed our feed, we figured the feed was fine. Apparently not. So what good is FeedforAll¿? Does you last response indicate we must slog through the code¿? If so, we might try for a rebate on FeedforAll¡!

Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Posts: 2393

sunmt wrote:

Jime ?—?—

Thanks for staying with us. We tried again. No luck. We went to that Apple link and danced through all the points. Scanned is a better word than danced. Our reaction is that we bought FeedforAll to avoid dealing with the code. It took us a few dances to get through FeedforAll. When it finally OKed our feed, we figured the feed was fine. Apparently not. So what good is FeedforAll¿? Does you last response indicate we must slog through the code¿? If so, we might try for a rebate on FeedforAll¡!

No you should have to go through code, but the spec does have good tips on testing and submitting. If you want to post a link or email to to (FFA Win) or (Me/FFA Mac) and we can look at your feed.

Jim